http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sunnisevens/message/1522
Q: A person pointed out to me that 786 is not the numerical value of \"Bismillah
Hir Raahma Nirraheem\" but it is the numerical value of \"Hare Krishna\", he
therefore concluded that it is incorrect for Muslims to write 786 in order to
seek blessing in the beginning of any work. Is the above statement correct? Was
this practice of taking out numerical value (numerology) present at the time of
Rasoolullah Sal lallaho alaihe Wasallam ?
A: 786 is indeed the numerical value of \"Bismillah Hir Rahma Niraheem\", what
difference does it makes if it coincides with the numerical value of the name
\"Hare Karishna\"? A Muslim writes 786 with the intention of \"Bismillah...\". It is
mentioned in the first Hadeeth of Bukhari that for everyone it is their
intention that matters. A person who performs Salaah for the pleasure of Allah
he is rewarded duly and the one who performs Salaah to be noticed by people is
not rewarded.
In the period of our beloved Nabi Sal lallaho alaihe Wasallam numerology (the
knowledge of interpretation of words according to numbers) was present, as
evident from the following incident.
Hazrat Abdullah Ibn Abbaas (May Allah be pleased with him) narrates, Abu Yasir
Bin Akhtab, his brother Hayy Bin Akhtab and Ka'b Bin Asharaf asked Rasoolullah
Sal lallaho alaihe Wasallam \"to swear and tell us if the Alif Laam Meem has been
revealed on you as is\"? Our beloved Nabi replied \"yes\". Hayy then said \"if you
are truthful then your Ummah will remain for a few years, so how can we accept
this religion.\" They pointed out that according to the knowledge of numerical
value it is obvious from the letters of Alif Laam Meem that this nation will be
obliterated within 71 years. Hayy asked, \"is there any other word like this.\"
The Beloved Rasool Sal lallaho alaihe Wasallam replied \"yes, there is Alif Laam
Meem Saad.\" Hayy said. \"this value is 161 which is more than previous\". Then he
asked, \"is there any more?\" the beloved Rasool Sal lallaho alaihe Wasallam
replied \"yes there is Alif Laam Raa.\" Hayy said \"this is even more than first
and the second, and we bear witness that your Ummah will only be dominant till
231 years.\" Then he said \"is there anything else besides these?\" The beloved
Rasool Sal lallaho alaihe Wasallam replied \"yes Alif Laam Meem Raa is also
revealed on me.\" Hayy said, \"we won't believe in you because we are not sure as
to which one of your words we should believe.\" Then Abu Yasir spoke, \"we bear
evidence that our Prophets have informed us that this Ummah will rule but they
did not tell us for how long, so if Muhammad is truthful in his statement then
according to my understanding Alif Laam Meem, Alif Laam Meem Saad, Alif Laam Raa
and Alif Laam Meem Raa all will be gathered for this Ummah.\" Then all the Jews
got up and left by saying \"your matter is doubtful to us.\" (Hashiya Saikh Zaazah
Tafseer Bedawi, Vol 1, page 65)
It is clearly evident from this narration that the knowledge of Numerology was
used in the discussion and the beloved Rasool Sal lallaho alaihe Wasallam was
well acquainted with the subject matter, and answered questions according to
their level of understanding. It also indicates that this knowledge was not
hidden from Rasoolullah Sal lallaho alaihe Wasallam.
However it must be noted that numbers cannot have the same significance as the
actual recitation orally or in the written form of the complete Quranic words
and cannot replace it.
Q: is it allowed to have a tooth made of silver or gold, or to use a silver and
gold wire to support the shaking teeth?
A: according to Imam Abu Hanifah ( May Allah be pleased with him) it is allowed
to have silver teeth, but not gold teeth, however use the silver or the gold
wire to support loose teeth is permitted.
Q: what is the correct method of positioning hands in the Salaah according the
four righteous Mazhabs?
A: according to Hanafi and Hambali Mazhab one must fold one's hands below the
navel, according to Shaf'ee Mazhab hands one must fold above the navel but below
the chest and according to Maliki Mazhab it is Makrooh to fold the hands in the
Fardh Salaah but it is recommended to fold the hands in the Sunnah Salaah.
Q: If in Sajdah both the feet are lifted off the ground or only the tips of the
toes touches the ground without the fleshy portion of the toes being pressed
onto the ground, would the Salaah be valid? Also if the nose does not touch the
ground in the Sajdah position would the Salaah be valid?
A: if both the feet were lifted from the ground or only the tips of the toes are
touching the ground and not the fleshy part, Salaah would be null and void. If
the fleshy part of one or two toes touches the ground and fleshy part of most of
the toes did not touch, in this case Salaah would be Makrooh Tahreemi Wajibul
I'aadah (must be repeated). (Ash'atul Lam'aat, vol 1, page 394; Durre Mukhtaar,
M'ah Raddul Mukhtaar, vol 1, page 313; Fatawa Razvia, vol 1, page 556)
Note: it is Fardh in Sajdah that at least one of the toes (inner part) must
touch the ground and it is Waajib that 3 toes (inner part) of both the feet must
touch the ground.
It is Waajib to press the nose in Sajdah until the pressure is felt on the bone
of the nose. If some one performed Sajdah in such a way that his nose did not
touch the ground or if it was touched but the pressure is not felt on the bone
of the nose, Salaah becomes Makrooh Tahreemi Wajibul I'aadah (must be repeated).
(Fatawa Razvia, vol 1, page 556; Bahare Shariat, part 3, page 71)
Q: My parents have taken Bai'at with a Peer Sahib from India. When he came to
our house and told us that our house was affected with 'jaadoo' and pointed out
the culprit is my mother's sister. He also told us that a worker in our shop who
is Muslim was busy stealing from the shop. I would like to know if what this
person said is credible and can one have such powers to reveal such secrets?
A: According to Shariah these methods are not valid to prove someone as a thief
or to prove who has done 'jaadoo' It is clear that this 'peer sahib' is lying.
It is mentioned in the Hadith of the beloved Nabi Sal lallaho alaihe Wasallam:
\"be aware of Zann (thinking ill about others) surely the Zann is a biggest lie\".
These types of people play on the emotions of innocent people and create Fitna
to fill their pockets. They cause great harm in personal relationships and make
people suspicious of close family and friends. How could such things be
permitted in Islam? Stay far away from unscrupulous people like him as his
intention is to make money from cleaning out this 'Jadoo' and improving the
family business. His lies could cause an innocent person to loose his job. In
fact to confide, trust and seek help from these type of people is not permitted.
It is mentioned in the Hadith that such a person who uses the service of these
types of people will be in the danger of not having his Salaah accepted for 40
days (Mishkaat, page 393)
Q: I stood up to perform Zohr Salaah, but I mistakenly uttered Asr in the
Niyyat, will the Zohr Salaah be valid?
A: Niyyat mean what you intend in the heart, therefore if your intention is that
I am going to perform Zohr and from your tongue the word Asr is uttered the
Salaah of Zohr will still be valid. Similarly if one intends to perform Fardh
and mistakenly utters Sunnah, Salaah the Fard Salaah would still be valid. Ita
Niyyat (intention) and not mere words are important. What is in the heart that
really matters.
Q: some people recite \"Allaho Akbar\" as \"Aaalaho Akbar\" by pulling the \"Alif\" or
as \"Allaho Akbaaar\" by pulling the \"Ba\" letter, would this type pronunciation
have any impact on the Salaah? In some Masjids the Moazzins pronounce the word
\"Allaho Akbar\" as \"Aaalaho Akbar\" or \"Allaho Akbaaar\", will that Azaan be valid?
A: If a person mispronounces \"Allaho Akbar\" by saying \"Aaalaho Akbar\" (by
pulling the \"Alif\" letter of word \"Allah\") at the time of starting the Salaah,
his Salah has not yet commenced. This means it is pointless for him to proceed
any further and if he mentioned it incorrectly anywhere else during the Salaah
the Salaah becomes null and void. Because pulling the \"Alif\" changes the word
into a question according to Arabic grammar. This means that \"Allah is the
Greatest\" changes to the question \"is Allah the greatest?\" Allah Azza wa Jal
forbid! Allah undoubtedly is the greatest and therefore this mispronunciation
creates doubt in His greatness.. Similar rules applies if someone pulls the
\"Ba\" letter of \"Allaho Akbar\", because \"Akbaaar\" means \"drum\", or \"menses\", or
it is the \"name of Shaitaan\". This would mean (Allah Azza wa Jal forbid) \"Allah
Azza wa Jal is drum\" or \"Allah Azza wa Jal is menses\" or \"Allah Azza wa Jal is
Shaitaan\" (detail can be seen in Fatawa Shami, vol 1, page 304)
If the Moazzin pronounces the word \"Allaho Akbar\" incorrectly as it has been
explained above, then that Azaan is invalid, it would be regarded as open and
public insult of Almighty Allah Azza Wa Jal. This is indeed a very serious
matter and should not be treated lightly. Mosque committees must consult the
learned Ulama and appoint the right people for the duty of Imaamath and Azaan.
Q: is it allowed for the Muslims to shake hands after the five daily Farz
Salahs?
A: to shake hands is Sunnah, great virtues of shaking hands are mentioned in
many Ahaadith, and surly it is allowed after the five daily Fardh Salaah. It is
mentioned in Durre Mukhtaar, Kitabul Hazr Wal Ibahah, Babul Istibra: \"shaking
hands is allowed even if it is after Asr, and what the Ulama have said about its
being Bidah, it means allowed and Good Bidah as Imam Nawa'wi has mentioned in
his Azkaar\" and in Raddul Mukhtaar, vol 5, page 252, it is mentioned under the
same discussion \"Imam Nawa'wi has said that shaking hands after every meeting is
recommended, the custom off shaking hands after Fajr or Asr has no proof in
Shariah but there is no harm in doing that. Sheikh Abul Hasan Bikri has said
that the condition of Fajr and Asr is because of people's habit which was
practised at the time of Imam Nawa'wi otherwise shaking hand is allowed after
every Salaah\"